<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media&#8217;s misperception of stuttering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stutteringiscool.com/links/medias-misperception-of-stuttering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stutteringiscool.com/links/medias-misperception-of-stuttering/</link>
	<description>Stutter With Confidence!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 15:29:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://stutteringiscool.com/links/medias-misperception-of-stuttering/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stutteringiscool.com/?p=172#comment-88</guid>
		<description>I really like the documentary for its clear and uncompromising view on what it can be like to be a person who stutters. A powerful movie to share our experiences and feelings with the general public. However, when Unspeakable deals with causes of stuttering, he is adding ketchup to a chocolate cake. He puts forward his own opinion indirectly by interviewing Darrell Dodge on the causes of stuttering who is absolutely not representative of the research community, in fact he is not even part of the research community. Moreover, Dodge&#039;s theory of &quot;stuttering as a self-inflicted disorder of speech, communication, and awareness&quot; is not supported by evidence, but in fact I would argue that latest genetics research contradicts it. But, I have to be fair and say that I agree with many individual statements / insights on his website, but not with his general conclusions which just show to me that he never did research himself i.e. like the pope talking about sex! By not clearly sticking to his own experience and giving his view of why people stutter John does a colossal disservice to himself, Unspeakable, and the people whose experiences he wants to get across.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the documentary for its clear and uncompromising view on what it can be like to be a person who stutters. A powerful movie to share our experiences and feelings with the general public. However, when Unspeakable deals with causes of stuttering, he is adding ketchup to a chocolate cake. He puts forward his own opinion indirectly by interviewing Darrell Dodge on the causes of stuttering who is absolutely not representative of the research community, in fact he is not even part of the research community. Moreover, Dodge&#8217;s theory of &#8220;stuttering as a self-inflicted disorder of speech, communication, and awareness&#8221; is not supported by evidence, but in fact I would argue that latest genetics research contradicts it. But, I have to be fair and say that I agree with many individual statements / insights on his website, but not with his general conclusions which just show to me that he never did research himself i.e. like the pope talking about sex! By not clearly sticking to his own experience and giving his view of why people stutter John does a colossal disservice to himself, Unspeakable, and the people whose experiences he wants to get across.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

